this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

NZ Off topic

4 readers
1 users here now

This community is for NZ discussion about random non-NZ things, or whatever you want! Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, something you found funny, anything goes!*

*except for:

If you want to have a serious political discussion, take it to !politics@lemmy.nz.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] liv@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Would it help if you photoshopped a bunch of trees with different superficial characteristics but kept the defining traits of the subspecies and trained it on those images?

[–] Longpork3@lemmy.nz 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe, if you could reliably render known traits based on descriptions for which we likely don't have photographic evidence.

You risk tainting the model though. If some artefact of the photoshop gets detected well by the model, then it will quickly learn to identify photoshopped trees, not trees that actually look like the target species.

[–] liv@lemmy.nz 2 points 3 months ago

Ah that makes sense. Kind of like the old AI problem where it thought fish had fingers because most of the training material had people holding up the fish.