Privacy

789 readers

28 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Alternative to GrapheneOS (feddit.org)

submitted 4 months ago by Linsensuppe@feddit.org to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

58 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Im considering buying a new phone and i don't really consider a Pixel. I really like Fairphones approach, with the self repairable stuff. Even though they don‘t have a headphone jack. But well… I can’t change it. I’ll definitely go with the adapter over wireless headphones.

But to my question: What private OSes are there? Fairphone sells FP4s with eOS, how is that? And does it work on the FP5? GrapheneOS only works on Google Pixels right?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 26 points 4 months ago (2 children)

In that case, have fun coding up your own bootloader and flashing it onto the device. If you can't trust the bootloader, then you can't trust anything at all from the operating system that sits on top of it, because it could be compromised. If you can't trust a bootloader, then the only thing you can trust is a pen and a piece of paper.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago

True but it feels like obscurity via obscurity.

[–] Chickerino@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

why dont we just put uefi on phones

[–] Cube6392 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Phones don't use an IBM-PC architecture. You'd need a phone based on an architecture phones aren't usually based on or You'd need to re-engineer UEFI to work for an architecture it wasn't designed for

[–] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

UEFI has supported ARM for years now...

[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

And "phones don't use UEFI"