Technology

37741 readers

63 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

115

Google's goo․gl links will stop working in August 2025 (9to5google.com)

submitted 4 months ago by corbin@infosec.pub to c/technology

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 122 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The dumbest part is like, why? How much work is it really to keep goo.gl links around?

In 2018, Google wanted developers to move to Firebase Dynamic Links that detect the user’s platform and sends them to either the web or an app. Google ended up also shutting down that service for devs.

lmao

[–] jarfil 37 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

How much work is it really to keep goo.gl links around?

A lot.

Goo.gl has a namespace for 10 billion entries, it used to keep tracking/analytics data for each link, with a user interface, and it would happily generate them for links to internal stuff.

Just keeping it running would take some containers of server racks, plus updating the security, accounting for changing web standards, and so on.

Keep in mind this isn't some self-hosted url shortener with less than a million entries and a peak of 10K users/second, that you can slap onto a random server and keep it going. It's a multiple orders of magnitude larger beast, requiring a multi-server architecture just to keep the database, plus more of the same for the analytics, admin interface... and users will expect it to return a result in a fraction of a second, worldwide.

[–] Kissaki 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They could drop all the tracking though and only serve the public redirects. A much simpler product that would retain web links.

[–] jarfil 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think they've dropped the tracking already. Still, where's the money in that?

They also can't release the database, not without prior consent of the link creators, or risking exposing some login credentials some very smart people might've put in there.

[–] Kissaki 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Why does there have to be money in it when they're sunsetting the service?

[–] jarfil 1 points 4 months ago

Google/Alphabet is a for-profit corporation, it makes no sense for them to do anything without some sort of profit.

[–] Penguincoder 12 points 4 months ago

Good analysis, I agree and understand.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 7 points 4 months ago

Yeah, shouldn't be too hard to at least keep the existing links working in a read only state.