Brisbane

12 readers

1 users here now

Home of the bin chicken. Visit our friends:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

lodion@aussie.zone

deadcat@aussie.zone

gronax_au@aussie.zone

brisbot@aussie.zone

Push for battery subsidy as home owners say solar benefits becoming 'marginal' (www.abc.net.au)

submitted 4 months ago by PetulantBandicoot@aussie.zone to c/brisbane@aussie.zone

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was quoted around $15,500-$16,000 for a 12.8 to 13.5 kWh battery plus install for comparison.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You see, that's the opposite of my caravan's solar. It can sit up there in the full sun and potentially generate a lot of power, but it won't send a single thing to the caravan or the batteries unless they request it. So the batteries and the usage of the caravan pull power from the panels, but the panels do not push power, so to speak.

So that makes me wonder if the solar panels on the roof are the same. The reason I say that is that the electricity companies want to charge us for solar generation because they say that we are feeding so much power into their grid that it's stressing the grid out. But if it's the same as my caravan solar then it is not. And I guess that's why I was hoping that somebody who knows about these kind of things could put some input in.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The grid is effectively an (nearly) unlimited sink. So nearly all your power you generate gets pushed into it.

The catch is that as we all collectively push more and more power in, it increases the frequency (50hz -> 50.1hz), and most inverters have a cuttoff if the frequency gets too high. But as far as I know, that almost never happens, but if it did, that could cause a large set of power generation to drop offline simultaneously, which would then cause a frequency drop and a subsequent brownout.