this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
9 points (100.0% liked)

NZ Off topic

4 readers
1 users here now

This community is for NZ discussion about random non-NZ things, or whatever you want! Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, something you found funny, anything goes!*

*except for:

If you want to have a serious political discussion, take it to !politics@lemmy.nz.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm pretty sceptical about ground effect planes, there's a very good reason why they've never really taken off, despite so many countries and organisations giving them a try over the years, but I'd love to know what everyone else thinks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Should be a lot more efficient than a plane, and able to carry more with a smaller wingspan and less power required.

https://youtu.be/yVdH_dYlVB8

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLXvxJNOIXBsMyYPykdtoWRj1m5DRn4CNx

[โ€“] Dave@lemmy.nz 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

That's awesome, thanks for sharing! For your first link about the Soviet programme, they talk about all the issues, and hypothesize that getting these working properly probably requires larger aircraft than has ever been built, because these can fly higher under ground effect, up to 10 or 20 metres.

Given the original article here states these tiny planes will fly 10 metres above the sea, I am skeptical that they will properly operate under ground effect. Wikipedia states that the effect is about half of the craft's wingspan, putting it at a lot less than the 10 metres claimed.

And as mentioned in this comment chain, the nice videos in the article are actually all little models and it seems they haven't actually built any of these craft at full size, so the chances are pretty low that anything will actually come of it.