NZ Off topic

4 readers

1 users here now

This community is for NZ discussion about random non-NZ things, or whatever you want! Shitposts, circlejerks, memes, something you found funny, anything goes!*

*except for:

anything against the global instance CoC
anything too controversial (keep it light-hearted)

If you want to have a serious political discussion, take it to !politics@lemmy.nz.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Dave@lemmy.nz

cloventt@lemmy.nz

Seagliders' 35-minute trips to Auckland closer with $145m deal (www.nzherald.co.nz)

submitted 6 months ago by Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz to c/offtopic@lemmy.nz

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm pretty sceptical about ground effect planes, there's a very good reason why they've never really taken off, despite so many countries and organisations giving them a try over the years, but I'd love to know what everyone else thinks.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Electric ground effect has a major advantage vs the jet turbine driven ones.

It does not have to suck in massive volumes of air close to the ground....sea water is not good for jet turbines.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sea water is a nightmare for anything mechanical, in my experience, but electronics can at least be sealed effectively. Usually.

The biggest reason I'm so sceptical about this, is every other use case I've seen for electric vehicles or vessels has been something that's already a proven concept. Cars, trucks, planes, harbour ferries, they are all a proven concept, we're just moving to a different fuel.

Ground effect planes, on the other hand, have never been proven with any fuel type.

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 3 points 6 months ago

Good point.... We will just have to watch and find out. Ground effect theory, and somewhat practice is sound.