this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
200 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

149 readers
19 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
200
Self regulation "working" as intended (i.imgur.com)
submitted 6 months ago by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/climate@slrpnk.net
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/feb/08/australian-red-meat-industry-says-it-doesnt-need-to-meet-its-self-imposed-net-zero-target

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Pilgrim 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Regulation could work, we just need the political will to give these agencies teeth and goals that align with reality

[โ€“] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 months ago

I really doubt it. The agricultural lobby is super strong. Meat would have to become either super expensive or super subsidised to be anywhere close to "green". You'd have to fix all the animal feed production first, too. People would not accept paying 3 times more for meat either.