To be fair the bitrate of the video is insane at ~5700 Mbit/s. The bitrate is so insane that you should really consider using an NVME drive for playback.

MPC-HC could kinda play it but only with extreme stutter and lag. My CPU (Ryzen 9 5900x) was completely maxed out.

I think you need hardware acceleration for a video like this.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Forget playback. How was that video file recorded? How do you even store data that fast, let alone encode it?

[–] lud@lemm.ee 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

You can read more about why and how it was made here: https://www.svt.se/open/en/content/

The only place I could find where I could kinda play the video is inside Davinci resolve, but it doesn't look how I would like it to. Probably due to the apparent lack of HDR support in Resolve on Windows (unless you have a separate TV connected to the PC somehow.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ohhhhhh. It's a video decoder torture test. "If your app can play this it can play anything" sort of deal. That makes sense.

Also makes sense that VLC puked.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

I think it's more of a test for encoding, not sure if you are really supposed to try and play it in an app.

[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 4 points 8 months ago

1 Terrabyte RAM with a 64GB RAM Drive perhaps?

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I think you need hardware acceleration for a video like this.

ok but why would anyone have a video like that

[–] lud@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

You can read more about why and how it was made here: https://www.svt.se/open/en/content/

It's basically intended to test encoding and stuff like that.

[–] Belgdore@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Maybe some kind of super slow motion high resolution type thing?

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 5 points 8 months ago

Yeah I could definitely see this for slo-mo and data recording in an actual laboratory setting that requires it to be as accurate as humanly possible. Idk if this is a standard though I'm not a scientist.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago

but if you're gonna watch it in slow motion anyways then why isn't it saved as a slow video that is much longer?

[–] tortiscu@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Cinema_Package

[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Deleted by creator.

[–] deadly4u@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

JPEG2000 = not lossless

[–] lud@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

JPEG2000 supports both. That's why I specifically said that the video is lossless

https://jpeg.org/jpeg2000/

[–] deadly4u@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Right! Sorry, I assumed this was regular JPEG

[–] sherlockholmez@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Where can I try this

[–] lud@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Here: https://www.svt.se/open/en/content/

I downloaded "natural complexity" or something like that. Unfortunately FTP downloads are limited to 100 Mbit/s so downloads can take a while. Imo they should make a torrent.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 1 points 8 months ago

Certain programs can do multithreaded downloads on ftp servers. Winscp is one that can do it. Idk about other software