this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
209 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

757 readers
1 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

EU :

Our commitment to the fediverse is here to stay.

We are working on a solution to ensure our continued presence on your feeds, taking full advantage of Mastodon's identity portability.

And we are even growing the team behind our Mastodon presence, increasing efforts to engage with your comments on our posts.

We are fully committed to being a real part of the conversation in the fediverse.

Interested in our next steps? Follow us as we take on this new chapter.

/me : 🤔

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 43 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The fediverse really needs key-signed messages.

As long as accounts reside on one server it fails to accomplish its goals, IMO

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 8 points 6 months ago
[–] krippix@feddit.de 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

But wouldn‘t the public key need to be somewhere to? At some point down the line you will probably have to trust some server.

[–] excel@lemmy.megumin.org 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

No, that’s not how that works.

Users can generate their own keys, and you know it’s the same user as long as they have the same key, even if they’re on different servers.

No certificate authority is required for this kind of use case.

[–] Turun@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

Ok, but if it's not bound to something like an official domain name how can you be sure the person who signed their posts as president of the EU (or whatever the official title is) to actually be that person is real life?

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

He's right that the public key would have to be somewhere, maybe on the profile page. The public key would be one more thing to be federated across servers.

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

It could be shared across instances too. It's not a hard problem.

Fediverse currently has totally centralised takedowns and bans coz it uses the same account-model as Twitter/Facebook

[–] Tja@programming.dev 6 points 6 months ago

Yes, we need another PGP vs S/MIME flame war, it's been so long!

[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It would be a simple enough feature to code on top of the existing Fediverse

[–] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Is there any benefit to it over nostr though? You'd have to link your public key to your account(s) and store a backup of your private key in addition to your regular login/password just to get a more fragmented and less seamless version of nostr. A lot of people already have issues figuring out how fediverse works with multiple instances and all... now they'd have multiple accounts with different credentials to keep track of on top of a meta login/password (pub/priv key). With nostr you only have 1 login/password (pub/priv key) to everything, it's just long and you can't change it. At least I think that's how it works, I don't really use twitter/nostr/mastodon type of sites.

[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

Userbase.

This game is more about mindshare. It's not about technical capabilities. Facebook are technically dismal.

https://stats.nostr.band/

https://the-federation.info/