Pawb.Social Feedback

6 readers

1 users here now

An official community for users of Pawb.Social services (furry.engineer, pawb.fun, and pawb.social) to provide feedback and suggestions.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

crashdoom@pawb.social

Join or ignore the anti-meta fedi pact (fedipact.online)

submitted 1 year ago by brodokk@pawb.social to c/pawbsocial_feedback@pawb.social

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is a bit political but i feel this should be looked at. Whatever it's on on the Lemmy instance or the Mastodon instances.

My main concern is about the concept of Embrase Extend Extinguish they could use.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Stellario@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

ActivityPub is a W3 consortium standard, so Meta really can’t “control” or “own” it.

I wish more people understood this. The fediverse isn't owned by anyone. I'm not a big fan of Meta, but I think people overreact. It is not like Meta suddenly saw people joining Lemmy and decided to become federated. They were working on ActivityPub compliance for a while now. Twitter was too, but Elon may have laid off the people working on that.

But ultimately, it's up to each instance to decide. I'd rather some instances federate and some instances de-federate Meta. That how all this works--each instance is different.

[–] Lockely@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

W3C set the protocol for websites as well, but Google has such a dominant position in the market that sites have to cater to their version of things versus the actual standard.

We give them an inch and they'll take a mile, as these corporations always do.