this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
207 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1036 readers
26 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Barbados indicated on Friday its intention to recognise Palestine as an independent State says Minister of Foreign Affairs Kerrie Symmonds in talks that according to the official started in September last year. ⠀

The FM said there is an incongruity and inconsistency because "how can we say we want a two-state solution if we do not recognise Palestine as a state?” ⠀

The Palestine State recognition it is expected to be very welcomed by the local pro-Palestinian campaign group, the Caribbean Against Apartheid in Palestine (CAAP), which has been pushing for Prime Minister Mia Mottley, who has previously condemned the genocide in Gaza, to do more to stop the Israeli siege.

Declared a state by the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) in November 1988, and accepted as a UN non-member observer state in 2012, the State of Palestine has so far been recognised by 140 of the UN’s 193 member states.

Archive link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I don't understand your question. Can you please explain it?

Maybe the answer is colonialism?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Israel gets to be recognized as a state despite not negotiating with Palestine.

Palestine isn't allowed to be a state without negotiating with Israel.

It's a double standard.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's immensely unfair, but I'm not sure I'd call that a "double standard."

I'm no expert, Israel was accepted as a UN when they pledged to implement the partition plan. They've never followed through, so you could argue they lied to get in, but once they're in, it's difficult to expel/suspend a member.

It looks like it wasn't until decades later that Palestine sought UN membership. So it kind of makes sense to say the applicant needs to appease the existing members. You could also argue the partition plan was/is unfair, and many wars have been fought over it. I'm just not sure the situations are similar enough to be a "double standard."

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This isn't about appeasing existing members, it's just the US blocking everything. Also, asking the colonized to negotiate with their own colonizers is absurd - just wolves and deer negotiating on what's for dinner.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

...still not a "double standard"

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

The double standard is "Israel gets to be a state without negotiating with the people it's stealing the land from, Palestine doesn't get to be a state without negotiating with the people who stole their land." It's a double standard enforced by the US, but it's definitely a double standard and the rest of the world can see it.

All the US is doing is destroying its own credibility and the legitimacy of the UN. This shit is going the way of the League of Nations.