Linux

1259 readers

100 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

164

Which communication protocol or open standard in software do you wish was more common or used more? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

177 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Whether you're really passionate about RPC, MQTT, Matrix or wayland, tell us more about the protocols or open standards you have strong opinions on!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 7 months ago (1 children)

IPv6, needed for modern Internet not to collapse, would make many other important things easier. Easier to become an ISP, to selfhost, to build P2P networks, etc.
GNU Taler, a payment protocol just look at it go: https://101010.pl/@didek/111934952208145427, or just imagine building a payment terminal of a Raspberry Pi
Matrix, to unify chat, conference and calling apps
some self-arranging darknet protocol becoming a norm like I2P, GNUNet or Yggdrasil, so we could have a backup when mass Internet blockage happen

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Matrix I have doubts about. The idea of Tox was nicer, but the implementation quality and the scandal at some point didn't help.

Tox felt more playable, like piping files over it or a remote shell over it (I know, bad associations, but still), or even using it for VPN. I think there were clients allowing to do such stuff, and the protocol allows it.

EDIT: I mean, it's still alive, just don't see it claiming the place of FOSS old Skype replacement as it did.

GNUNet - all you people mentioning it have peers? I tried to set it up a few weeks ago, couldn't get peers.

Yggdrasil - feels cool.

I2P - not intended for that, I think.

[–] Cosmiss 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What scandal did Matrix have? I only just tried out Matrix like a month ago and am unaware of anything like that.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago

Tox, not Matrix.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago

I2P - not intended for that, I think.

to be clear, I2P is not really intended for anything, it's used for everything. It supports all kinds of things, and there are people doing all kinds of things on it. Though i could see potential technological limitations being a problem.

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

About Tox, I am not a fan of mixing up universal delivering of packets and applications. Piping files or using as VPS feels like something that would be better done with proper full network and not be mixed with chat.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago

I, on the contrary, think it's cool for things to be universal, layered and reusable for different tasks.