Pawb.Social Feedback

6 readers

1 users here now

An official community for users of Pawb.Social services (furry.engineer, pawb.fun, and pawb.social) to provide feedback and suggestions.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

crashdoom@pawb.social

Join or ignore the anti-meta fedi pact (fedipact.online)

submitted 1 year ago by brodokk@pawb.social to c/pawbsocial_feedback@pawb.social

84 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This is a bit political but i feel this should be looked at. Whatever it's on on the Lemmy instance or the Mastodon instances.

My main concern is about the concept of Embrase Extend Extinguish they could use.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Casuallynoted@pawb.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm of the opinion that we should defederate right away from Meta's service. I don't see any advantage to giving them a chance as their whole modus operandi is collecting and harvesting user data. The whole NDA stuff really rubbed me the wrong way.

[–] Casuallynoted@pawb.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For those who don't know, Meta reached out to big instance admins and invited them to some kind of meeting:

https://mstdn.social/@stux/110567524159195690

Stux didn't go but was invited, and confirmed this. Those who went were made to sign an NDA.

[–] Soatok@pawb.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I say block based on this experience alone.

[–] Casuallynoted@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I don't like devs using the term "fediverse stakeholders". Big big red flag.

[–] Lockely@pawb.social 10 points 1 year ago

The fact all these big admins went to a facebook gathering, were made to sign an NDA, and now refer to themselves as "stakeholders" is more than sus. This is a clear EEE attempt. Reinforcing my vote of pre-emptive block. Keep this data-stealing corporate nonsense out of our spaces.