Amateur Radio

35 readers

3 users here now

General amateur radio (ham radio) chat, questions, and news

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

w0odl@lemmy.radio

Log dilemma; seeking your input (lemmy.radio)

submitted 7 months ago by 667@lemmy.radio to c/amateur_radio@lemmy.radio

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I have a small dilemma regarding logging a QSO, and I'm wondering if you can guide me through it. I made a contact the other day while doing POTA, but I did not capture the entire callsign. The error was only revealed after I saw their re-spot on the POTA site; if it weren't for that small glimpse, I would never know, and we'd never confirm in QRZ.

The Eagle Scout in me suggests that I should not change my logs based on the 3rd party information, but my QSO sent me a QRZ confirmation request.

On the other hand, borrowing from aviation, I am keen to "use all available resources", recognizing that so long as we have the tech and tools, we should use them, even if that may fly in the face of radio purity.

What say ye?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BaldProphet@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

On the other hand, borrowing from aviation, I am keen to “use all available resources”, recognizing that so long as we have the tech and tools, we should use them, even if that may fly in the face of radio purity.

Hmm. I think this is generally fine, but if you were working a contest (like Field Day, for example), it would probably be cheating. I don't think there's any problem with taking the Eagle Scout route, though. Holding yourself to a higher standard of honor brings its own rewards.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Thank you. I sat on it for a couple days and have decided to leave it out. I am sure I’ll QSO with that contact again and we’ll be able to confirm.

[–] ham_bitious@lemmy.radio 1 points 6 months ago

For POTA contacts I'd just fix it.

In a contest that would be cheating.