this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
684 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

234 readers
54 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

I have heard that notion before, but don't know how the maths is supposed to work.

I can tell you, though, that light would be going faster than light, if it could.

Here's a simple equation you probably know:
F = m * a
(F is force, m is mass, a is acceleration)

Well, if you rearrange it, you get this:
a = F / m

We currently believe photons to have no mass.
Insert that into the equation and you get a division by zero, but our closest approximation means acceleration is infinite, as soon as any non-zero force is applied.

Infinite acceleration results in immediate infinite velocity. It makes no sense for light to only accelerate until 300,000 km/s and then take its foot off the gas pedal.

This is why it's instead believed that there is a speed limit to causality itself.
The speed of light (as well as of gravitational waves and other massless things) just happens to be the same value, because they're going as fast as is possible.

Here's a video about the speed of causality: https://www.pbs.org/video/pbs-space-time-speed-light-not-about-light/