this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
50 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1034 readers
19 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UsernameHere@lemmings.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Iran has been indirectly responsible for terrorist attacks on innocent cargo ships.

The US is just trying to get other countries that communicate with Iran to relay the message that their escalations are not in anyone’s best interest.

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

"Terrorism" is when you're blocking supplies to a genocide lmao. Yemen has mainly just been attacking western-aligned ships, particularly those related to israel, US and the UK — the main ones committing the genocide; they're not "innocent", they're complicit. They've reassured that they won't attack Russian or Chinese ships for example (though that has led to instances of UK ships masquerading as Chinese to not be attacked).

Ansarallah's leader, Abdel Malik al-Houthi's position has consistently been that the blockade will stop when the US support for israel's genocide of Gaza stops.

their escalations are not in anyone’s best interest

Yet the US proxy is escalating by bombing an embassy. They would be talking to israel instead of Iran if they actually cared lol.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmings.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The houthis attacked a Chinese oil tanker in the Red Sea. Is China sending supplies to a genocide?

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 21 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Probably the result of some UK ships masquerading as Chinese in the Red Sea to not be attacked. China has not complained about it though, and sure as hell hasn't bombed Yemen in response, unlike the western crybaby countries.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmings.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

So China supports terrorism even if it hurts their own people. That’s sad

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

? No Chinese people were hurt from that afaik.

And why would that matter? Is a Chinese person's life more valuable than the Palestinian lives the blockade is saving?

What you're thinking of is nationalism, and the nationalist/fascist party fled to Taiwan in the Chinese civil war lol

[–] UsernameHere@lemmings.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The blockade hasn’t saved any Palestinian lives. It is just escalating the situation.

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The fact that the US is crying this hard about it means it is successfully pressuring them and their proxy.

Again, if the US actually cared, they would just stop funding and supporting the genocide.

[–] UsernameHere@lemmings.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The US doesn’t negotiate with terrorists

[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yet they're funding and supporting them? What a weird government

[–] UsernameHere@lemmings.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The attacks on the cargo ships that are not related in any way to the Gaza situation? The US isn’t funding those terrorists.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 8 points 5 months ago

That is patently untrue