this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
33 points (100.0% liked)
/kbin meta
200 readers
2 users here now
Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign
founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That seems very one sided, and like it's easy to get fake rep by just posting to a boost mag and having everyone boost you. Most people besides content creators seems like they well end up in the red, I mean are many people boosting comments? probably not, more boost are going to go to content creator which rewarding content creators is good, but in theory if they are making good content that should be rewarded with interaction and new views, not by making it so it's hard for people that are more commenters (which you also need for a functioning website) to be seen as positive.
also guess that means for now I am gonna focus on boosting content I like.
Yes, it definitely needs to be changed. After the boost <-> fav switch, this indicator doesn't make sense anymore.
Ah fantastic to hear from the boss, thanks for all the hard work, loving kbin so far!!
Will this be counted retroactively when done?
It's worse than that, since there is no limitation on boosts to your own posts not effecting your reputation, a person can artificially increase their own reputation without the need for anyone else to collaborate on the system gaming by flooding an unused magazine with posts and boosting every one of them.
Conversely, someone with an axe to grind can lower someone's reputation dramatically by going to a person's profile and downvoting everything they have ever posted.
So long as "score" is irrelevant (i.e. can't result in a targeted autoban) it doesn't really matter, but neither thing should be possible.