this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2022
19 points (100.0% liked)
Open Source
823 readers
26 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yep, RIP.
I, too, am empathetic of needing to pay for rent, food etc., and Akka has always been basically too good to be true/free, but there's no chance we can continue to use it at $DAYJOB like this. We had a difficult standing with it already, because lawd forbid, we weren't building run-off-the-mill CRUD applications in the lowest-common-denominator technology.
It was also basically our argument for using Scala. Scala is excellent. Simpler and more mature than Kotlin. But Kotlin won the popularity contest, so again lawd forbid, someone might have to spend two days reading up on the syntax differences. Basically, because management is scared of programming languages.
With Akka, you had a framework that had a significantly more usable and documented Scala API. For Kotlin, you had to adapt the Java API, which is far more complex and that adaptation is not documented.
So, yeah, we kind of don't have an exit strategy here. Basically having to hope for a fork to magically appear, so we can continue freeloading off of that. Don't have much of a choice here, unfortunately.