this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
130 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37726 readers
59 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Imho a decision that doesn't make sense, Google already has paid for all the infrastructure so running the service to them is pure profit, not to mention the lost possibility to upsell Google workspace (paid gmail with a custom domain) or Google cloud services to all their customers.

Although I would never subscribe to something from Google for my business, then when they eventually change mind and kill my product, i have to migrate in an hurry. I've been hurted too many times

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SilkenTofu@readit.buzz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't even need to trust the cloud storage as long as you have a sufficiently strong database password.

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Sure; But that's only true for as long as it's true - So I can understand the kind of person who isn't comfortable storing their password dbs on someone else's servers.