this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1036 readers
34 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] authed@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

how about nuclear-powered cars? so I can drive 1 year on 1 tank... or 5 years on my motorcycle.... too bad they are so focused on weapons.

[–] constantokra@lemmy.one 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There's a nuclear test site in Georgia where the us government did preliminary tests for a nuclear powered airplane. It was bat shit insane. It seems the idea was not to shield the reactor, but to only shield the crew, and rely on distance and speed to not irradiate basically everything else.

To that end, they built a nuclear reactor that could be hoisted in and out of a hole in the ground so that it could be run unshielded above ground. They tested the effects on all sorts of materials, and a huge swath of surrounding woods, including all the creatures there, which promptly died.

It's now a recreational area, and considered generally safe, except for a few small, fenced off areas.

So my point is, watch what you wish for.

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A few years ago, Stephen Colbert did a segment on a pair of radioactive alligators at the SRS

[–] constantokra@lemmy.one 1 points 8 months ago

I'll have to check that one out.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They've tried it. It's too dangerous to have that much nuclear material running around. Not only does it make sourcing for a dirty bomb very easy, but it's also a question of disposal, and how to contain it in a collision.

[–] authed@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

maybe I could be the only one owning one.... problem solved. I think the containment in case of collision probably could be solve 90% of the time...