Europe

106 readers

1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

poVoq@slrpnk.net

What if the problem with cars was not their method of propulsion? Epthinktank | European Parliament (epthinktank.eu)

submitted 8 months ago by revisable677@feddit.de to c/europe@feddit.de

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Instead of just electrifying vehicles, cities should be investing in alternative methods of transportation. This article is by the Scientific Foresight Unit of the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), a EU's own think tank.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SirHenry@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah where did you get these energy numbers for the train? But you can use regenerative energy surces and since train wheels are mostly made of metal there is almost no microplastic produced.

I dont think you can kill as many people with bikes than you can with a car.

All in all some weak ass counter arguments.

[–] AlexS@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Only German and Swiss sources, sorry for that. But should not differ much to other countries.

But you can use regenerative energy surces

Same with electric cars.

I dont think you can kill as many people with bikes than you can with a car.

If bikes would drive the same annual passenger-kilometers, they would.

[–] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If bikes would drive the same annual passenger-kilometers, they would.

This is insanely deceptive.

This could only possibly be true if cars continued to be used at the same rate. The vast majority of deaths involving cycling are from cyclists being killed by cars. If people traveled as many miles by bike as by car today, cycling deaths would be practically eliminated because there would be no cars to murder them.

[–] AlexS@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're right that 60% of all accidents of bikes are with cars. And of these 75% are caused by cars. Link So with less cars and better infrastructure bike-accidents could be cut in half and deadly accidents nearly eliminated.

Glad that you accept trains as not much more energy efficient than cars.

[–] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 2 points 8 months ago

100% of car involved crashes involve cars. That's just tautology. Even in acknowledging the fact that you completely misrepresented or just outright lied with your data, you're can't seem to help continuing to blame the victim.

I haven't accepted trains are more efficient than cars because they aren't. I refuted you elsewhere. It's kind of self-apparent when you're not paid to believe something else.