this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
69 points (100.0% liked)

Blahaj Lemmy Meta

87 readers
1 users here now

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Wrote this as a comment, but was too long. Feel free to disagree.

I think that lemmygrad should be defederated, but i think that lemmy.ml should not be defederated, not for now anyway. The vast majority of people on lemmy.ml are not tankies, and politics or tankieism is not a major topic of discussion on lemmy.ml.

Idk if this is true, but I heard that they suppress anti-ccp views, but as long as they don't defederate from other instances, you can always just post them here or on whatever other instance and they'll still be fully visible from lemmy.ml (i'm pretty sure this is true but not 100%, still pretty new to all this fediverse stuff). If they did however start defederating from every instance that allowed truth about "left" auth governments, then yeah ok you can defederate. But that is not what lemmy.ml is doing, at least not right now.

There's different rules based on instance, this will probably be a sticking point and has the potential to derail lemmy entirely if every instance is only federated with the "correct" instances. Lets say lemmy has 100,000 users, its not that much yet but for example. If there's 10 different "networks" that only talk to each other from that same network that has the same rules (obviously, bigotry/"don't be an asshole" rules need to be enforced for every instance), that site is doomed to failure vs if there's 1 network with everyone talking to each other and generally agreed upon default communities for each topic, or even the idea of "multireddits" in whatever form.

I'm not saying federate with every instance, I'm just saying it should be a HIGH bar, not a low bar like a differing signup policy. Being focused on porn makes sense or even if an instance was 50% porn, that'd make sense. Or obviously if there's bigotry, extremism or violence coming from an instance. Which lemmygrad.ml passes, but lemmy.ml doesn't.

If you defederate based on small things, then there'll be 10 gaming communities, 10 NFL communities, 10 "ask reddit" communities. Which is not sustainable obviously. This was one advantage of reddit, it was a "hub" that had 1 (maximum 2 if a split, there was never 3 that were totally equivalent for any topic) forum for literally every topic in the world. A single for profit company controlling pretty much every equivalent to a 2000s forum on the web was very convenient, but was always going to end badly.

Beehaw.org just defererated lemmy.world and shitjustworks, because of the open signups policy (as opposed to the waist high fence of a few paragraphs explaining why you're not an asshole)

That's a major mistake imo and i don't think I'll be using that account as my "main" anymore. Not like I dislike the instance or anyone from it, but a lot of lemmy is now invisible entirely from there.

TL;DR defederating should be used only when you are fundamentally opposed to the core of an instance. Otherwise the lemmy universe will fracture and fail

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kaladin_Stormblessed@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I disagree. I think that we should only defederate instances that are actively bigoted.

[–] henry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk if i said it right in my post, but that's what I'm trying to say. Probably about 1000 words too long and confusing lol.

[–] Kaladin_Stormblessed@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not convinced Lemmygrad reaches the qualifications to be defederated by that standard, though. I don't agree with them politically on a lot of things (besides being anti-capitalism), but I read it from time to time to expose myself to alternate viewpoints, and I haven't seen any bigotry there. On a quick scroll, the first thread I can find about LGBTQ+ stuff, for example, is quite supportive. I think I'm missing something, in which case, please let me know!

[–] henry@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Oh no you're not missing anything, I understand now. Thanks for explaining

[–] JasSmith@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I’m not sure I even agree with that. To some people, everything is “bigoted.” De-federation should only be used when a large group of an instance is harassing users on another. Otherwise we’re able to easily block individuals and even whole communities with a single tap.

[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I mean this is an LGBTQ instance. It's pretty clear what we mean when we say bigoted.

[–] Lily 1 points 1 year ago

Yes but if you’re blocking 10 individuals from the same instance every day, it kinda makes sense, and if there are people who are actually willing to engage in a good faith conversation from either side it’s easy to create an account on another instance

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lols@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago