cybersecurity

64 readers

1 users here now

An umbrella community for all things cybersecurity / infosec. News, research, questions, are all welcome!

Community Rules

Be kind
Limit promotional activities
Non-cybersecurity posts should be redirected to other communities within infosec.pub.

Enjoy!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

shellsharks@infosec.pub

tweedge@infosec.pub

Online bank One Finance removed my account's password in favor of only phone/email OTP and a 4 digit pin (lemm.ee)

submitted 8 months ago by Rexios@lemm.ee to c/cybersecurity@infosec.pub

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

How is this legal? This has to be the most insecure login method I’ve ever seen. They removed the password from my account without consent and have no way to go back to requiring a password. Literally all an attacker has to do it gain control of either my phone/email and brute force a 4 digit pin. I’m going to have to change banks because of this.

Oh also I posted this on the bad version of Lemmy and the mod tried to claim that this method of auth is actually more secure than a password, posted a Wikipedia article about passkeys, and then locked the post… In no reality is it at all possible that this is more secure than a password.

So stay away from One Finance if you value your money

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Ok, email is terrible. It just offloads the onus of security to your email provider. SMS/Phone call however meets the “something you have” aspect of MFA, PIN now counting as “something you know” aspect. Ultimately it sounds super weak, but that weakness can be mitigated by other aspects such as device fingerprinting, geo blocking, locking out after failed attempts, etc.

The thing is, at some point, the bank will have a customers account get breached no matter what they do. If they want to be lax on security, they better provide top notch customer service when a breach occurs because they’ve taken the onus of security off the account holder and limited their options on being more secure.

[–] Rexios@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

I would argue that a phone number barely counts as “something you have” because of how easy it is for attackers to gain access if they really want it. It’s more like “something your cellphone company has and lets you use”. I would rather have email 2FA over SMS because that account actually has a strong password and real 2FA on it. The truly terrible part is you can’t disable either auth option so any attacker has two attack vectors.

[–] misanthropy@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Sim swapping is stupid easy and common

Sms 2fa is not real 2fa. My non techie buddy's business got hacked, he got got for over a hundred grand.