/kbin meta

199 readers

2 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 2 years ago

173

Now that federation works, we need more clarity of source (kbin.social)

submitted 2 years ago by parrot-party@kbin.social to c/kbinMeta@kbin.social

46 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm seeing the federated content, but it's hard to tell where the content came from. Currently, the only reliable way to see the source is by reading the URL when you're viewing a thread. It doesn't work well on mobile though and it doesn't work for the feed.

How work everyone feel if the magazine included the source always? So instead of saying kbinMeta, you'd see kbinMeta@kbin.social? Or would you prefer another solution?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Including the source is good, but I look at the ability to have many communities with the same name as a strength.

It prevents autocracy and gives a diversity of takes on the same subjects. But yeah it would be nice to have the source always included. I see it already, but maybe because I'm on Lemmy.