this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
130 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1464 readers
31 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plactagonic@sopuli.xyz 94 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Cyclists, some people just see red when they came across cyclist at the road.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Bike lanes are car infrastructure. We cyclists are perfectly within our rights to cycle in the middle of the lane at a speed comfortable for us. And it's safer for us to do that than hug the shoulder and risk getting clipped by an impatient driver. A bike lane gets us out of your way so you can drive the speed limit. It's for your benefit.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 10 points 1 year ago

That's why it's hate for no reason!

The same hatred from the same haters for public transport too: if everyone else is in public transport there more room for you on the road.

It's a bizarrely prevalent attitude from a bizarrely large portion of car users.

We had some nice mini-traffic island things separating a cycleway on a road, drivers kept hitting them and damaging their cars. They complained and the council removed them despite it being obvious to anyone that they were doing extremely what they were supposed to do: stopping those idiots from hitting actual cyclists!

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought this as well but German drivers will dangerously swerve into oncoming traffic to overtake me sometimes when I block a lane. Even if there is a red stop light 50m down the road.

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, it's less of them, and at least they're risking their own lives too. If there's an accident I want the person responsible coming with me to the hospital. That might not be rational, but it's how I feel.

Lol it's not rational but I know how you feel. Sometimes I daydream somebody hits me and wrecks my bike and then feels so bad that they give me loads of money in hopes of me not suing them, and then I use that to buy a better bike. And then I wonder wtf is going wrong in my brain

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That's not "for absolutely no reason". Some cyclists make a bad name for the rest.

Edit: Oh my goodness, you guys. I'm not saying hate for cyclists is justified, that I hate all cyclists, or that "all cyclists do x". Some cyclists ride like they have a death wish. So do some drivers. Anyone, regardless of their vehicle, who is willing to put their life in my hands is someone I want to stay far the fuck away from.

[–] plactagonic@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I know an A-hole driver so all drivers must be A**holes.

No some people just don't have good reason.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

You can say ass on the internet bud, it’s ok.

[–] all-knight-party@kbin.run 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the thread was titled poorly. Anything that gets a lot of hate usually has some sort of reason, even if it may not be justifiable.

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's absolutely no reason to hate on a cyclist when you wouldn't hate on a car polluter, because unlike car polluters, we aren't murderers.

[–] ninjaphysics 5 points 1 year ago

Truth. Furthermore, accidents involving a bike and a car have mostly happened because of a lack of infrastructure and options for safe travel on bikes. Public residential streets, for example, are for all modes of transportation, not just cars. Car brains are hysterical and don't like that, and my life has been threatened many times while riding my bike on residential streets. I even had an older woman match my speed, roll down her window, and say "Next time I see you I'm running you over." Cyclists do absolutely nothing to deserve this, and even if they're holding up traffic, it's no excuse for homicide.

[–] all-knight-party@kbin.run 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sure there are many reasons to hate on a cyclist, (not that I personally believe this, but) such as when they block a single lane road slowing traffic to a crawl and placing the responsibility of possibly accidentally killing a cyclist in the motorist's hands, though you could argue that's more about the fact that the roads don't have dedicated bike lanes, and that's not the cyclist's fault, but it is still a reason, not that that reason is justified, I like cyclists!

[–] exocrinous@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

For thousands of years, people walked on roads. That's what they were for. They were also for horses, donkeys, and carts, but humans were a big part of it. And none of those four things really goes faster than a bike. Cars are new. Taking people and horses off roads is new. Being able to drive the speed limit is a new, temporary condition, and it can be taken away at any time. Blaming this on cyclists is a reaction based on a misunderstanding of what roads are for. Personally, I support legislature to let people walk on the road however they like again.

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

That's exactly what I was trying to say. I was also a (very cautious) cyclist until my bike was stolen.

[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Except Berliner cyclists. They scare me.