this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3926 readers
1 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Climate Tech Reporter David Roberts discusses battery recycling with ceo of a company that is working on scaling up a newer fossil fuel free method of melting down and separating battery metals. This method has advantages of not burning up most of the valuables and sending them into the open atmosphere as well as not requiring a constant stream of harsh chemical feed, or having chemical waste.

Today his small scale plant is handling mostly the waste from faulty primary manufacturing, and is looking to scale up in time for the 2030 boom in lithium battery recycling.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's true for fossil fuels, but not renewables.

If producing synthetic methane or biofuel pulls 100g of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere, but the whole process of producing the fuel is only 80% efficient, then you can only burn 80g of carbon dioxide. That's net negative.

This is different that the efficiency of the ICE, which of course means the carbon still ends up in the atmosphere.

[–] Dippy 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What so 20% of carbon in the production ends up as some kind of slag? That's a pretty slow way to sequester. For at scale sequestration, I would rather see more permanent and efficient systems.

I mean, I'm all for capturing the methane given off by farms and landfills anyway and using that to generate what it can, but I don't think that's a wise choice to base large segments of the economy on. It could account for maybe a few megawatts of the 200-400 giga watts we need.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Its a battery. So only to be used in off-peak or as a dense fuel where we havent yet built electric lines above roads to power busses and trains

[–] Dippy 2 points 9 months ago

Batteries are charged in off peak, but may be used during peak to flatten out the grid and to make up for low solar/wind days