this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
129 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1036 readers
37 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive: [ https://archive.is/z7xcs ]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] randy@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Basically they don’t want NATO right on their doorstep.

NATO is not the anti-Russia club. They're a defensive pact. Why would you be concerned about your neighbours agreeing to defend each other? Like a neighbourhood watch, perhaps. Maybe you'd be upset if you're planning to do the thing they're defending against. Which is all the more reason for those neighbours to band together.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

NATO was founded pretty much explicitly as the anti-USSR club. And it doesn't even matter what it factually is - it's what Russia perceives it as. See their final ultimatum: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Putin's_December_2021_ultimatum

[–] randy@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's how Putin claims to perceive it, but that's also what he would claim if his actual goal was to control his neighbours by force. And don't forget Finland and Sweden responded to the invasion of Ukraine by joining NATO. If Russia perceived NATO as a threat, then Finland joining would make them more likely to be attacked. Clearly Finland feels NATO is making them safer or they wouldn't have joined. And since then, Russia has moved tons of their military away from NATO borders and into Ukraine.

In other words, I trust the actions of Finland and Russia more than I trust the words of Russia.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

Yes, it couldn't have gone better if NATO planned this all along.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wait until you hear what that defensive pact did in Yugoslavia and Libya

[–] randy@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You know, you have a point. But I'll note both instances had the UN request NATO intervention. Russia could have blocked either with their veto in the UN Security Council, but they didn't.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean, no, the UN security council doesn't have any power, they would have still gone through with the invasion.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

Not to mention the actual voting on intervention was in the start of 1992, when the comprador Russian government (the same one btw that got promised by USA they won't add former socialist countries to NATO) was choking on USA boot.