Programming

423 readers

3 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

What are some common misconceptions about programming that you'd like to debunk? (programming.dev)

submitted 9 months ago by mac@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

82 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BehindTheBarrier@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I don't disagree that this is hard to read, but I feel it's worth mentioning python has a pretty acceptable style guide. The problem is, it's far less common in python to bundle parameters into some holding object. So here you have massive function that has to accept a lot all at once. In use it's probably not as bad looking however.

And at least, it actually explains all the damn parameters. It's a lot nicer than seeing functions parameters you don't understand, and all you have is the name. This is not limited to python either

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There are plenty of other languages that have named parameters but no holding object. You format it like this:

some_func(
    foo: 1,
    bar: 2,
    baz: 3,
)

And this works fine. Of course, not everyone does that, but I almost never see it done in Python.

This style comes into conflict with rules that functions shouldn't be longer than 20 lines for whatever. The solution to that is to be relaxed about the line count rule. I'd rather see 40 trivial lines than 20 with everything crammed up.

[–] BehindTheBarrier@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

Completely agree with that, we have the same issue in C# where I work. Just waiting for the day I get to push and update to our shared code style (editorconfig) to force that.