Selfhosted

573 readers

1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Resources:

> Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

> Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

[Help] How can I self host services (eg, a website, lemmy instance, vpn) on my own hardware while hiding my IP? (lemmy.sdf.org)

submitted 1 year ago by helpimnotdrowning@lemmy.sdf.org to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(I asked this on r*ddit a long while ago, but I don't think I explained myself properly)

Basically, I would like to host a few services on my own metal (and not anywhere else in the world!) to play around with and learn, like my personal site, lemmy instance, vpn, fdroid, image host, etc etc.

I would also like to hide my public IP address because I don't want people who connect to me to know my location (even if it's rather coarse).

I know that this isn't possible without at least another server in a different physical location, but I really have no idea how to approach this. What software do I run? What is this action called? What do any of these AWS/Azure service names mean? How much would I realistically need to pay? Etc etc.

Anyone have any pointers?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Check into Cloudflare Tunnels.

[–] SmugBedBug@lemmy.iswhereits.at 4 points 1 year ago

Was going to suggest CloudFlare as well. At the very least just setup your DNS with there nameservers and benefit from CloudFlare proxies on the IP addresses.

But tunnels is pretty sweet.

[–] dap@lemmy.onlylans.io 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cloudflare tunnels are great but OP may not want to have to authenticate each user to their services.

[–] SmugBedBug@lemmy.iswhereits.at 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed, but they could always setup a bypass rule.

[–] dap@lemmy.onlylans.io 3 points 1 year ago

True, in that case CF tunnels may be easier to manage due to fewer moving parts to configure. Good point!