this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
10 points (100.0% liked)

Neoliberal

5 readers
1 users here now

Free trade, open borders, taco trucks on every corner. Latest discussion thread: April 2024 **We in m/Neoliberal support:** - Free trade and competitive markets

founded 1 year ago
 

The bill would remove first cousins from the list of family members with whom it's illegal to have sexual relations in the state.

Edit: there is an update to this story and Rep. Nick Wilson has withdrawn the bill saying it was filed in error. See the new thread.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CoffeeAddict@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Here is a link to the actual legislation:

(c) Engages in sexual contact; with a person whom he or she knows to be his or her parent, child, grandparent, grandchild, great-grandparent, great-grandchild, uncle, aunt, nephew, niece, brother, sister,~~[ first cousin,]~~ ancestor, or descendant. The relationships referred to herein include blood relationships of either the whole or half blood without regard to legitimacy, relationship of parent and child by adoption, relationship of stepparent and stepchild, and relationship of stepgrandparent and stepgrandchild.

First cousin is crossed out.

Remember everyone, this is the party of “family values.”

Edit: Nick Wilson now claims this was filed in error. See the new thread.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I can already see several problems here.

  1. How are they gonna prove what a person "knows"

  2. How many generations does "ancestor" or "descendant" factor for? This law is not prepared for cryogenics or time travel to be introduced to society

relationship of parent and child by adoption

Didn't Queers used to adopt one another before marriage equality was realized? Can this legislation be used to go after couples with those old (or current, if Obergefell gets struck down) jury-rigged marriages?

[–] Arcane_Trixster@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Can this law be used to hurt older gay people? Also, what about time travelling gays, can we hurt them too?"

You people...

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

I never mentioned the time travelers or enstassised persons potentially adversely affected by this law being gay specifically, and I think in Kentucky of all places "could this be used to hurt Queer people" is a pertinent question.

Now what do you mean "You people"?