this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
828 points (100.0% liked)

196

664 readers
46 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LemmyAtem 33 points 1 year ago (26 children)

Honest question - what's a tankie? I feel like I've seen them mentioned a ton on Lemmy but I'd never heard the term prior to a few days ago. From the image it looks like a maga/skinhead combo?

[–] SirSnufflelump@lemmy.world 98 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're communists, but not your every day "people should hold the power" communists. More like "tianenmen never happened, and if it did it wasn't that bad" type

[–] argv_minus_one 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which makes them no different from the western imperialists they hate so much.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 year ago
[–] agreyworld@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Tankie was first used for that kind of communist supporter who kept singing Russia's praises/defending Russia even when Russia was sent 5000 tanks to crush a popular uprising in Czechoslovakia (the "Prague Spring") on August 20, 1968. Some people just couldn't accept that a communist country could do something bad, so defended the action.

Nowadays, it's used to refer to those that are strongly supportive of Russia, completely ignoring the awful things they do. Often these days there's a lot of anti American bent to it. Like, anything anti America and American "imperialism" must be good - even blatant and awful Russian Imperialism.

These days they calmly explain how Ukraine just needs to come to the table and discuss peace (ignoring that Ukraine wouldn't exist if they did so) and blame America for the war in Ukraine for... well... they're America. The people who want war, or are causing the war, are those giving Ukraine weapons - not the country that is literally invading it.

[–] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the explanation. I believe they are also called Rashists, at least Ukrainians call them that.

[–] Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago

I think a better term is "Campist" which is the trend within revisionist marxists to side with one imperialist camp to oppose another. it's the same shit the SPD did during WW1

[–] Discoslugs@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

Basically, it's Communists who support authoritarianism.

[–] Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what is "authoritarianism" to you?

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (8 children)
[–] Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well that's just childish isn't it

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

do you consider that a rebuttal?

[–] Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yes because it's not anything intelligent enough to be thoughtfully argued against. a 7 year old could see the holes in such an idea

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I oppose one more system of authority than you do, in the interest of ideological consistency, intellectual honesty.

are you taking the position of a literal child?

[–] Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

is revolution not putting the authority of the people over those in power, and bringing those people low? that's "hierarchy"

[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

that depends if you draw distinction between the people and the state (which is merely an abstraction of capital)

state capitalism, as defined by lenin, is not a classless society, and is indefensible as a liberatory philosophy.

just as liberalism abolished the monarchy only to replace it with a dictatorship of private capital, authoritarian socialism replaced monarchy with a beaurocratic ruling class and unilateral control of the means of production.

the neck cares not the color of the boot

[–] Discoslugs@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for posting this.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

how is a small group of people commanding a big mass better?
at least over time there will always be power hungry asshole or just an idiot in position of power.

no power for no one is the only concept that can really work over time. but you need self-responsible and educated people for that

edit: and yeah, it is a utopian idea, but one I believe it is worth working for

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's a lot of abstractions in that link but I think the following action is a meaningful distinction to call out:

The term is also used to describe people who endorse, defend, or deny the crimes committed by communist leaders such as Vladimir Lenin,[7][8] Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, and Kim il-Sung.

[–] aski3252@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Originally, it was used to describe communists who followed the party line and supported suppressing Hungarian workers with tanks.

Today it means ultra-authoritarian marxist-leninist.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean there is a word for that that's less derogatory: Stalinist

[–] h34d@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not entirely the same though. Some of the "tankies" in the West seem to be Maoists more than Stalinists, as far as I can tell. Besides, some (many?) Stalinists also consider the term "Stalinist" derogatory, and prefer to call themselves "Marxist-Leninists".

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Ok but let's not pretend that either Marx or Lenin envisaged their form of communism as what Stalin was doing

It's no different to "free speech" suddenly meaning "free hate speech, but restricted speech on anything else"

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy 1 points 1 year ago

We want to use the more derogatory term because Tankies don't just have bad takes, but are actively harmful and dangerous counterrevolutionaries.

[–] Scurvotron@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

From the image it looks like a maga/skinhead combo?

For context, the image originally said kick nazis out of punk.

[–] LemmyAtem 1 points 1 year ago

Oh okay, got it. Thanks!

[–] arisunz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 year ago

genocide denier and hard authoritarian. fash dressed in red, basically.

load more comments (20 replies)