Selfhosted

573 readers

1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Resources:

> Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

> Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

135

Are all these thousands of lemmy servers useless? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Averrin@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

154 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Correct me if I'm wrong. I read ActivityPub standards and dug a little into lemmy sources to understand how federation works. And I'm a bit disappointed. Every server just has a cache and the ability to fetch something from another known server. So if you start your own instance, there is no profit for the whole network until you have a significant piece of auditory (e.g. private instances or servers with no users). Are there any "balancers" to utilize these empty instances? Should we promote (or create in the first place) a way how to passively help lemmy with such fast growth?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's the alternative? You go full-banana decentralised or mega-site Reddit. I think Lemmy is a nice middle ground

[–] skarlow181@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Proper data model would be a start, i.e. public-key based identities instead of just the old name@server. That way you could hop from server to server and still be the same account. Would make the whole thing a hell of a lot more robust, as in case of server failure could just continue as if nothing happened on another server.

[–] nii236@lemmy.jtmn.dev 1 points 1 year ago

That's a pretty cool idea! Keybase and SIWE were getting there, but hasn't really taken off in a big way yet