this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
166 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1454 readers
58 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I would really rather that these were actual examples, and not conspiracy theories. We all have our own unsubstantiated ideas about what shadowy no-gooders are doing, but I'd rather hear about things that are actually happening.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That global poverty has declined because of the spread of liberal economies

[โ€“] Nemo@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'll bite. Why has global poverty declined?

[โ€“] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

For the most part it hasn't actually declined, but where it has can't be fairly ascribed to that.

I'm mostly going off the argument made here which seemed pretty convincing to me. The gist of it is that the statistics used to push the narrative of neoliberal effectiveness on poverty are presented in very misleading ways.