this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
41 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

40 readers
17 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lugh@futurology.today 26 points 10 months ago (3 children)

OP is a sci-fi writer himself, so he's in a good position to comment. The TLDR of this piece is that most sci-fi is produced by commercial writers trying to earn a living by producing relatively formulaic work that follows genre conventions. The problem is some of today's tech-billionaires are acting as if these books are bibles of future prediction.

Oddly, people seem less influenced by the positive, utopian sci-fi visions. 'Star Trek' depicted a humanity that moved beyond money, and where society was devoted to exploration and the advancement of knowledge. You rarely see billionaires go on about making the world like it. Perhaps unsurprisingly, as there were no billionaires (or any need for them) in 'Star Trek'.

[–] Skunk@jlai.lu 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That’s why as a (really small and unknown) sci-fi writer I want everyone to write utopia and beautiful futures instead of dark dystopia where life is a nightmare.

Because if sci-fi has any influence, make it a good one, solar punk Star Trek style or whatever. What is the point of fighting for the future if you strongly believe it will be worse than today.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They must have seen S1E26 of TNG where Picard tells the rich asshole he needs to get a job and thought "well fuck that."

[–] Endward23@futurology.today 1 points 10 months ago

‘Star Trek’ depicted a humanity that moved beyond money, and where society was devoted to exploration and the advancement of knowledge.

And this is, tbh, considered really unrealistic, even by the mayority of the fanbase itself.