this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
828 points (100.0% liked)

196

667 readers
38 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] starship_lizard@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (17 children)
[–] chalkman@sh.itjust.works 86 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Hard-core authoritarian communist. The kinda peeps who support Stalin and shit

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 35 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Isn't "authoritarian communist" kind of an oxymoron? 😂 like the whole point of communism is that there isn't a ruling class. I guess Russia and China were never really communist, just statist authoritarian right? I mean, the Nazis called themselves Socialist. They were nowhere near that

[–] argv_minus_one 34 points 1 year ago

Isn’t “authoritarian communist” kind of an oxymoron?

Yes. Yes, it is. I sometimes call them “pseudocommunists” for this reason.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't "authoritarian communist" kind of an oxymoron?

Most real life implementations of communism used an authoritarian one party system. You can say these aren't true examples of communism, but that just ends up sounding like cope unfortunately.

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy 24 points 1 year ago

None of those states ever gave economic or political power to the working classes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 year ago

As how Marx outlined Communism as the evolution of Capitalism once it reaches a scale of production that everyone can have their needs met, resulting in a classless, stateless, moneyless society, then yes authoritarian communist is an oxymoron.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] aMalayali 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stalin

Certain aspects of Stalin? Or in general?

[–] peanuts4life 76 points 1 year ago (60 children)

Both. Fascist apologist like to cherry pick palatable characteristics of figures like Stalin, or Hitler, or Andrew Jackson in order to destigmatize thier idolatry of these figures. These "certain aspects" are the tip of the wedge they use to destroy rationality and peace.

A reasonable person who would like to discuss the benefits of communism would point to the value of labor, advantages of unions, and the dignity of the worker, not the evil, paranoid, and violent person of Stalin.

Always, the stink of fascism follows the idolization of so called "great men." Excuses after excuses.

[–] Dee@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I appreciate you arguing even though it's with a brick wall.

[–] peanuts4life 14 points 1 year ago

Lol. To the contrary! I think communist lady has proven to be in interesting person to argue with. 😅😅😅😅

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (59 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ProcurementCat@feddit.de 79 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (26 children)

When the Soviets invaded Czechoslovakia in 1968, there were some british leftists who cheered for those tanks driving into Prague. They proved by this that they didn't care about leftism, socialism, democracy or anti-imperialism at all - they approved the imperialism and militarism of the Soviet regime.

Their praise for the rolling tanks is what gave them their name: Tankies.

So, people who love North Korea, or defend russia invading Ukraine, people, who stand by even the most autoritarian, anti-democratic, militaristic, imperialistic regimes - just because they call themselves "socialist" or "communist" - are "Tankies".

[–] Coryneform@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CrimsonOnoscopy 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And Stalinist, Maoists, and other authoritarian Communists.

Usually they also "love" countries like North Korea, China, and for whatever reason (aNtI iMpErIaLiSm), Syria, Russia, and so on.

Red Fascists. They use the same tactics of gas lighting and goal post shifting.

[–] GuyDudeman@possumpat.io 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And engaging in bad faith but accusing everyone else of engaging in bad faith.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] lauchmelder@einweckglas.com 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] limbo99@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's the prog-lib equivalent of woke. It's used dismiss leftists with out engaging with our arguments. The term has lite ideological or argumentative use.

[–] Darorad@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Libs use it that way, actual leftists use it to describe fascists that think they're on the left and like red flags.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)