this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
93 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
12 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

For sure I understand it's more tricky than just going out in the woods making a big pit and calling it a day (though the image I had in my mind was pretty close to that if I'm being honest). Just feels like there's plenty of space far enough from anyone's backyard but you make a good point about having to then supply that site.

Made me question where France was putting theirs and it's in l'Aube, rural area but definitely not empty by any means. Except for the real nasty stuff that's being temporarily kept by the producers on-site until they apparently plan to bury them in a deep geological argile formation (projet cigéo).

[–] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

On site deep geological disposal is possible using boreholes. There's a Kyle Hill video touching on it.

Above ground storage is in dry casks, is it not? Hardly that nasty. I guess if it is in pools, out might arguably be nasty.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

What I meant is the stuff they want to geologically bury are the very radioactive parts that are 0.2% of the volume but 95%+ of the radioactivity, that's all.