i feel like you'd be able to type out what you meant by that several times already in the time it took us to type out this back-and-forth, i'm legitimately unsure what you meant by that

the only good reason i can imagine why one wouldn't want to do that is because nato opposition in certain circles exists as a vague and nebulous pent-up hostility without any sort of concrete and detailed plan to combat it, which would provide a concrete framework upon which one would be able to act, and in the absence of which anything ones says can't be criticised because it's so vague and inconcrete...

i may be wrong though 🤷‍♀️