this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Self-Hosted Main

21 readers
1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

For Example

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
communick@selfhosted.forum
2
Question: Instead of Nextcloud, why not use a FTPS server with an nice client? (alien.top)
submitted 1 year ago by antoine849502@alien.top to c/main@selfhosted.forum
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I genuinely courious to know, why has this very old and established protocol lost over cloud solutions like Nextcloud (or even Google Drive)?

note: the question is for both FTPs or sFTP

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] adamshand@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my opinion, they do different things.

SFTP/SCP are great ways of transferring files between computers. I prefer rsync for most things because it can resume transfers and checksum results. I'd never use FTPS because SFTP/SCP comes with SSH, and why run a separate service? SSHFS is another way to use SSH to transfer files (it mounts a remote file system to your local computer so you can use all your normal file management tools).

NextCloud (and similar) do a bunch of additional things:

  • Provides clients which sync files to your local computer
  • Provides a web interface for managing files
  • Provides ways to share files without creating accounts
  • Allows connecting external storage (eg. S3)
  • Provides encryption
  • And a lot more

If SFTP does everything you need, that's awesome. Use it. :-)

[โ€“] antoine849502@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for your answer, answers my question perfectly!