this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

Self-Hosted Main

21 readers
1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

For Example

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
communick@selfhosted.forum
9
What you guys are hosting instead of Nextcloud? I'm sick of it. (alien.top)
submitted 1 year ago by Sudden_Cheetah7530@alien.top to c/main@selfhosted.forum
90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I am hosting more than 10 services currently but only Nextcloud sends me errors periodically and only Nextcloud is super extremely painfully slow. I quit this sh*t. No more troubleshooting and optimization.

There are mainly 4 services in Nextcloud I'm using:

  • Files: as simple server for upload and download binaries
  • Calendar (with DAVx5): as sync server without web UI
  • Notes: simple note-taking
  • Network folder: mounted on Linux dolphin

Could you recommend me the alternatives for these? All services are supposed to be exposed by HTTPS, so authentication like login is needed. And I've tried note-taking apps like Joplin or trillium but couldn't like it.

Thanks in advance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MiddledAgedGuy 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  • Syncthing for files.
  • Proton calendar (so not self hosted)
  • Joplin, using file based sync with aforementioned syncthing. I saw you didn't like it though.
  • I occasionally use scp
[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For calendaring, I also went with the option of syncthing via DecSync. I can get my contacts and calendar on Android and Thunderbird, so I can avoid yet another unnecessary webapp.

[–] MiddledAgedGuy 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This does look cool! But I notice that there's really only one contributor (technically two, but the second only did one tiny commit) and they haven't contributed any code in over a year. I don't want to invest too much time migrating to a stale if not dead project.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, I think that the lack of commits is more due to the application being feature complete than "dead". I've been using it for at least 3 years now and it works quite well.

[–] MiddledAgedGuy 2 points 1 year ago

That's a fine point! You talked me in to checking it out. Thanks for the recommendation!