Homelab

22 readers

1 users here now

Rules

Be Civil.
Post about your homelab, discussion of your homelab, questions you may have, or general discussion about transition your skill from the homelab to the workplace.
No memes or potato images.
We love detailed homelab builds, especially network diagrams!
Report any posts that you feel should be brought to our attention.
Please no shitposting or blogspam.
No Referral Linking.
Keep piracy discussion off of this community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@selfhosted.forum

rglullis@communick.news

Database servers using NAS as storage? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by zyzhu2000@alien.top to c/homelab@selfhosted.forum

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am thinking of running multiple database/messages servers such as postgres, redis, mongo, influxdb on old computers and use a centralized NAS to store the data.

One advantage is that I don't need to worry about getting appropriate local storage for the computers that host these services. For example, I could run postgres on an old desktop with spinning disks or even a raspberry pi.

But I am still concerned about the I/O speed and reliability. I wonder if anyone has experience doing it like this. Can you share the pros and cons? I really appreciate it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SuperQue@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO, you really don't want to run databases over NFS/SMB. I've just seen too many corruption and locking issues over the years to trust it.

For home lab use, do you really need anything as big enough for a database that wouldn't fit on a Pi anyway?

For example, I run Prometheus on my Pi, no problem.

[–] Kapelzor@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you keep your card from not dying?

[–] SuperQue@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I use a Pro card meant for cameras. Also, Prometheus disk write load is tiny.