this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
41 points (100.0% liked)

Blahaj Lemmy Meta

86 readers
4 users here now

Blåhaj Lemmy is a Lemmy instance attached to blahaj.zone. This is a group for questions or discussions relevant to either instance.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi guys,

Do you think we should have a mega thread (maybe even a locked one if that's an option) explaining why each specific instance is blocked from this instance?

Just to give some clarity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But unless they are not doing anything illegal, why should even considering defedarating with them if you don't agree with their political or other views, ,just don't visit/follow/post. I just don't see why would you block access to it - seems a bit authoritarian for somebody to decide that because you belong in this group, you are not allowed to view/access this group.

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're tankies lol, they're genocide deniers. It's not really a matter of "I don't agree with them" it's "these people are awful", and I don't want them to come in here to "debate". They're not nazis, but they're in the same vein. Just from scrolling All/new, I randomly got a post about how "North Korea is actually doing great and all the defectors are lying".

I'm not a mod, I have no authority, and I don't decide at the end of the day.

[–] emstuff@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah it's so vile to see genocide denial right on the front page, lemmy.ml is the number 1 reason i've seen folks (understandably) deterred from even giving lemmy/fediverse a shot.

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

yeah even just looking at some post on asklemmy there was just a random "I don't want to see liberals on lemmy, it was made by communists for communists", which... eugh.

[–] CoachDom@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds reasonable! And if somebody doesn't agree, can either create an account under a particular instance.

Still, I believe in the spirit of transparency, it should be widely declared and known why specific instance got defederated.

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

yeah no absolutely transparency is the best

[–] rosesandlillies@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don’t agree/disagree as I don’t fully understand the nuances, but I’d assume it’s more of a protection as this server is more tailored towards a vulnerable minority, and eliminating a group of people who would pose a danger to this minority isn’t necessarily a bad thing, especially if you can just access it through another account or so. Now I haven’t interacted with or seen content from said tankies so I don’t know how bad the situation is etc, but theoretically speaking.

[–] rosesandlillies@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Eliminating access** lol Idk how to edit here

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Lol in context I knew what you meant, but the thought of just exterminating anyone that might be a threat is hilarious

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

The three little dots under your comment, then the square with a pencil.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phthalocyanin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what is the paradox of tolerance

[–] Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I agree that we shouldn't never tolerate intolerance, but I don't think we need to block of access to an entire server of people in response to the intolerance of a few. That's more appropriately handled in the realm of community/individual level blocks in my opinion.

load more comments (1 replies)