this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
67 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1454 readers
114 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been trying to find a good Marxist instance, but Lemmygrad and Hexbear are widely hated. Why is that? Are there any good leftist instances?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 42 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lemmygrad is filled with the American patriot version of communists. You will excuses for the Uighur genocide and acts of repression against ethnic minorities for the good of the nation as a whole. You also get into weird cases of trying to redefine words because the words don't match their narrative. For instance, I was in one discussion trying to argue that China was a democracy because the government worked for the people, even if there was never any official method of communicating the public will.

Hexbear seems more geared towards being angry and bitter at liberals for not doing what they see as the right thing. There isn't any discussion on political theory, talk of political organization outside of violent revolution is frowned on, and the focus seems geared on one small part of the political spectrum while ignoring other parts entirely.

If anything, solarpunk may be the healthier leftist sub because it is geared in part towards solutions instead of focusing on problems.

[โ€“] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Excuses for the Uighur genocide

Are you seriously still on that shit?? After everything that has come out??? Also I give solarpunk like a month tops before it goes ecofash.

[โ€“] rothaine 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ok, I'll bite. What is "everything that has come out"?

[โ€“] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

A bunch of journalists actually went to China to see the abuse for themselves and didn't walk away with anything to support that narrative. Best they could say to defend their case was "China is hiding the truth, that's why we didn't see anything" Over time, all the claims the right made about the "genocide" were slowly being deconfirmed to the point that it was becoming clear it was all made up. Is there a chance that some of the stuff actually was right? Maybe, but when you know it came from a place of bad faith you don't exactly need to waste energy debunking each and every claim from the likes of faith healers and flat earthers when they have a rich history of flat out lying to drive a narrative.

When people actively invested in finding out fucked up shit can't find any fucked up shit, it's a pretty good sign it's not happening.

EDIT: Doesn't help that a lot of the people making the biggest fuss about the Uighurs are all siding with Israel in their genocide. One of the big key things that genocide deniers do is make a big stink about fake genocides that they made up on the spot (Fx: the great replacement)

[โ€“] rothaine 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Do you have a source for this? Last I looked into the Uighur genocide, it was being reported by well-respected outlets (not faith healers and flat earthers) and had photos of people being marched into camps.

So for it to suddenly be "all made up" sounds rather far-fetched to me.

[โ€“] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I believe it was the AP who did a report on it.

[โ€“] ag_roberston_author 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Can you provide a link to the report?

[โ€“] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

CBA, it's not going to change anyone's mind anyway.

[โ€“] ag_roberston_author 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

๐Ÿ™„ Don't act like you were actually going to look at it, nobody who asks for sources on the internet actually gives a shit about the source, they're just doing it to waste the other person's time and/or respond with some variety of "that's a bad source" or "I'm still not convinced"

It's like a tic, liberals will go "Source??" whenever they see something they don't agree with, but then will guzzle down nazi propaganda like it's a fact because it aligns with what they already believe. I have literally never seen them actually respect the time put into finding the source.

[โ€“] ag_roberston_author 1 points 11 months ago

I asked for it because I knew it was bullshit you couldn't back up with a source that didn't exist. Before I commented, I searched for AP articles about it and found nothing, because it doesn't exist.

load more comments (1 replies)