Self-Hosted Main

21 readers

1 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

For Example

Service: Dropbox - Alternative: Nextcloud
Service: Google Reader - Alternative: Tiny Tiny RSS
Service: Blogger - Alternative: WordPress

We welcome posts that include suggestions for good self-hosted alternatives to popular online services, how they are better, or how they give back control of your data. Also include hints and tips for less technical readers.

Useful Lists

Awesome-Selfhosted List of Software
Awesome-Sysadmin List of Software

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@selfhosted.forum

What service one should NOT self host (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by SuperWill5633@alien.top to c/main@selfhosted.forum

96 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Like the title says, I'm new to self hosting world. 😀 while I was researching, I found out that many people dissuaded me to self host email server. Just too complicated and hard to manage. What other services that you think we should just go use the currently available providers in the market and why? 🙂thank you

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] audero@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Password manager. While some may cache on your client devices, by and large if your server goes down, no passwords.

[–] Cart0gan@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not necesarily. If you self host SyncThing and use it to synchronise your password database across devices (for example KeePassXC's .kdbx file) only the synchronisation goes down with your server.

[–] tech2but1@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Same with Bit/vaultwarden, all clients grab a copy of the vault from the server when they sync so if the server is offline all clients still "just work".