Data Hoarder

11 readers

1 users here now

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@selfhosted.forum

External vs Internal HDD for backup purposes? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by Leonhardt90@alien.top to c/datahoarder@selfhosted.forum

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

An Internal HDD has the advantage that you can see your data safely all the time, but I'd think that storing the data on an external HDD in a cabinet, or somewhere safe place probably makes the HDD live longer. Is that so? Or not really?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WikiBox@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I do both.

I have two SSD in both my PC and my laptop. And two DAS connected to the PC and shared over wifi. One of the DAS hold my large media and backups. The other DAS is mostly used for backups.

Every time I boot my PC, or laptop, a new rsync snapshot of the full /home on the primary SSD is automatically created on the secondary SSD.

I also manually create rsync snapshots of folders on the PC/laptop primary on the primary DAS and also of folders on the primary DAS to the secondary DAS. By manually I mean automatically, but only after I trigger it by double click on a script on the desktop.