Watches

10 readers

1 users here now

A community for watch & horology discussion.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@style.land

[Discussion] What are your hot takes or opinions you haven't yet posted for fear of downvoting? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by jewami@alien.top to c/watches@style.land

249 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In a post from a few days ago, I noticed that someone mentioned that they were afraid to post about their dislike of the Tudor BB58 for fear of downvoting. You know what? The BB is a boring watch that's not worth the money, and Tudor wouldn't be half as popular as it is without the connection to Rolex. If Rolexes were as attainable as they were in past years, cut that by a factor of 10. Would you really buy a BB if the reality were that you could just save a little bit more and get a Rolex Submariner? That's my hot take. What's yours?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Darkest_shader@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Watch size positivity movement is dumb. Sure enough, you can watch of any size on any wrist, but should you? Nope, because lugs going over the wrist by a large margin look ridiculous indeed. I am saying that as a guy with small wrists whose first watch was way too large, but who is happy now after having switched to a smaller size.

[–] Leeeumm@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wish I had smaller wrists because I love vintage stuff. I wear a 40-41mm. But I can't pull off a 35mm vintage omega 😢

[–] Zim_Crowley@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

It's funny because I'm the opposite. Have a 6.5" wrist and while I love some smaller watches, there are a plethora of cool designs and pieces I want, but can't wear because they're 42-46mm.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)