this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Science Fiction

173 readers
1 users here now

This magazine is aimed at fans and creators of sci-fi and related media of all kinds. It includes all content related to the sci-fi genre and only content related to the sci-fi genre. The goal is to build a community for everyone who enjoys science fiction and related topics. This includes the obvious books, movies, and TV shows, but also original writing, the discussion of writing SF, futuristic art and designs, and the science and technologies that inspire the sci-fi genre. **Team Top 20**

founded 1 year ago
5
Is time travel really possible? Here's what physics says (www.bbc.com)
submitted 1 year ago by inkican@kbin.social to c/scifi@kbin.social
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The ability to jump forward and backwards in time has long fascinated science fiction writers and physicists alike. So is it really possible to travel into the past and the future?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knusper@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'm no physicist, but this is such massive horseshit:

One of the peculiar observations that has emerged from the study of the quantum realm is non-locality. A change in a particle's state in one location can instantaneously influence another "entangled" particle somewhere else [...]

"A lot of physicists are very unhappy with the possibility of non-locality," says Adlam. That's because, for the effect to be instantaneous, the information must be conveyed from place to place at faster than the speed of light. This is supposed to be impossible.

Imagine, you've got a printed photograph. You rip it in half and put each half into identical envelopes. You mix them up and send one of them to Australia.
Now you open the envelope you kept and see that it's the left half. Boom! Instantaneous knowledge that the envelope in Australia contains the right half. Faster than light!

As far as my understanding goes, this is all there is to quantum entanglement. But because it's quantum, everyone loses their minds over it.

[–] marvus@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To my understanding it's one step more, not only observation but interaction as well, manipulating one side of the entangled particles resulting in an instant (and similar/same) change on the other side as well. In fact even the observation is a form of interaction in this case that changes the state of the entangled system.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 1 year ago

That's just a local "if" statement, where you assume something to be true based on local information.

You wouldn't actually know if a dingo ate the envelope unless you check it. The information to confirm your assumption is still in Australia.

[–] RickRussell_CA@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You're absolutely right. You're no physicist.

But seriously, for a practical example of "action at a distance", consider quantum key distribution.