this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
184 points (100.0% liked)

Risa

227 readers
1 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s 24XX, who the hell is still getting bent out of shape about homosexuality 400 years from now?

I'm pretty lukewarm on Discovery, I've seen all of it but most episodes only once, so maybe I just don't remember it. Who got bent out of shape over Stamets and/or Culber being gay?

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 17 points 1 year ago

Who got bent out of shape over Stamets and/or Culber being gay?

teenage redditors

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Tbh I might have a unique way of processing fiction, because my brain seems to process it as, "I'm watching a future documentary" or "I'm watching future reality TV" or something. Like, these people have a camera crew or something following them around, so the camera crew is part of the act if that makes sense; so when the camera crew focuses on something, my brain interprets it as being important to the fictional future-history.

As such, while I don't remember anyone actually being upset about them being gay in-universe, the fact that the camera crew seemed to like focusing on them being intimate makes my brain say, "this must be important to 23rd century humans in some way".

Then again, I'm also not super into shows that feel like they spend too much time focusing on romantic relationships, so I might also be more critical that I should be as a result. If you're gonna spend a bunch of time exploring a romantic relationship in a non-romance show, at least make it interesting. Maybe one of them is a cold-blooded lizardman and there's some conflict about the temperature of the crew quarters or something.

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's not a particularly unique perspective, many Trekkies choose to process Star Trek as "historical documents." There's a movie about it.

What I don't understand is why you've assigned this theoretical camera crew the intent of "get the camera on the gay dudes, stat" when "get the camera on the relationship between the two main characters" is a much simpler explanation. There are entire episodes dedicated to Odo & Kira, Paris & Torres or Trip & T'Pol relationship drama. Stamets & Culber screen time pales in comparison, and at least Stamets & Culber have some chemistry.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not a huge fan of relationships in media to begin with (unless it's somehow tied into the plot), so it's possible I'm being more critical and skeptical than I should be. I'm not exactly cishet so I'm not sure that's really it, but as someone else pointed out it's still not super common for gay characters, especially male characters, to be shown as being romantically involved, which can be jarring when you're not used to it. Dunno, it's weird.

That's not a particularly unique perspective, many Trekkies choose to process Star Trek as "historical documents." There's a movie about it.

That's kinda interesting, do you remember what the movie is called? I might watch it at some point.

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago

but as someone else pointed out it's still not super common for gay characters, especially male characters, to be shown as being romantically involved, which can be jarring when you're not used to it. Dunno, it's weird.

Yep, many people still struggle with it. What do you think it would take to change this?

[–] Snowcano@startrek.website 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the fact that the camera crew seemed to like focusing on them being intimate makes my brain say, "this must be important to 23rd century humans in some way".

Might I also suggest that another possibility is that until very recently, there has been so little gay representation on TV that merely depicting it at all, as Discovery has done, can feel jarring to some.

A friend of mine was complaining about the same thing back on Season 1, but I asked him if it had been a hetero couple shown brushing their teeth together or having a smooch would he have minded and he admitted probably not. We chalked it up to just not being used to seeing that with a gay couple on tv.

Just a thought.

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 8 points 1 year ago

I mean, I guess it's possible. When it comes to my gender and sexuality, I'd say, "it's complicated" because I'm not cishet, it's just... complicated. Additionally I don't tend to enjoy romance in media all that much to begin with, so it's possible that I'm being more critical than I should. It's just that gay relationships in media don't bother me, it's more when it feels "in my face" that I start to question the motivations behind it.

I guess the big thing is that if you're happy with it, then cool! Something about it just felt off to me.

[–] askryan@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

Frankly, the scene that introduced Stamets and Culber together I think was intended to surprise the audience in a different way –– Stamets is a huge jerk the previous few episodes and set up as a semi-antagonist, and that bit shows him in a very different light, as the audience/Burnham starts to thaw on the Discovery crew.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There was a multi episode story arc about a teenager (forgot her name, had a teenage boyfriend and got adopted by Stamets/Cullen) coming out as non binary and choosing they as their pronoun.

It was very heavy handed on drama, whereas if there was any internal consistency, there wouldn't be any "coming out" at all because "staying in the closet" wouldn't be a thing. The whole thing felt like having a Jane Austen dialogue in present Norway.

I would love to be able to say this was a one off occurrence, but pretty much all dialogue is heavy handed, with excessive drama not supported by the fiction. While TNG is rather under acted, DSC is heavily over acted. Out goes technobabble, in comes soap opera.

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A "multi episode story arc"? You mean these 90 seconds? The only way this bit of character and relationship development could be less "heavy handed" would be if it didn't happen at all.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Don't be like that. We're all discussing in good faith here.

Before that happens, Adira spends considerable time with the ghost boyfriend on how would that be received and goes through considerable angst processing it. Before even that it's shown them in considerable anguish to come out to their boyfriend even.

Of that arc, the one thing well executed was the 90 seconds you pointed.

So yeah, most of it shouldn't happen in a welcoming environment in the 25th century. Her adoptive parents had no issue being a gay couple adopting a teenager, in which universe would that teenager ever feel the need to hide their sexuality and insecurities from them? Why the anguish?

It's pretty much established since TNG and DS9 that pansexuality is mainstream. In The Outcast, Riker was involved with a non binary alien; the episode wasn't about the reactions (the crew was absolutely nonchalant about it), with Worf supporting Riker trying to rescue the alien that broke their social customs. You can still send a message with a good in universe justification.

There's no in universe justification for Adira. She doesn't come from a backwards culture, has crazy conservative parents, there's no atavic crewmate around, no aliens taking offense... It's a non conflict. It's bad writing.

To be clear, it's a message that needs to be on TV. But it's a damn shame they did it so poorly when it could easily have been set up to actually create a conflict that would then be resolved. You need in universe bigots to show bigotry being overcomed.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Before even that it’s shown them in considerable anguish to come out to their boyfriend even.

Cool! Do you have any examples from scenes that actually happened?

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would love to provide with some, but as it stands I'm not about to re-watch a show that didn't entertain me enough in the first time just to make a point on an internet argument.

If you like the show and disagree with me, great. I believe there's another season coming, so enjoy.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's an awfully roundabout way of saying you're spouting made-up bullshit.

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago

account from "An instance dedicated to nature and science"

asked to provide evidence for claims

refuses

[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s no in universe justification for Adira. She doesn’t come from a backwards culture

Regardless of your opinions about the storyline, you can address the character by their proper pronouns. Or you can choose to no longer post here.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It wasn't intentional. English isn't my first language and Adira being a female name where I'm from it just slipped out. I did get it right most of the time, but between articulating my thoughts and writing in English, I stumbled here and there.

Or you can choose to no longer post here.

What is that?

[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That phrase. What do you mean by that.

[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean you can choose to respect people's pronouns or you can choose to no longer be a member of this community. What is unclear?

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was having a really hard time processing the fact that what seemed like open discourse had so suddenly devolved to threats. Do you get a kick from doing that?

[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you feel like an expectation of a minimal level of respect for other people is a threat?

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now you're twisting my words. Reread what you wrote, there's your answer. This conversation has ran its course.

You're correct. Have a time out.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

it could easily have been set up to actually create a conflict

idk sounds kinda heavy handed on drama

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you sure it was in Disco? I've seen Disco twice and don't remember a character who was closeted. What episodes?

[–] GuyFleegman@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cullen

Seems like he's talking about... Twilight?

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Ha! I am very bad with names.