this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
32 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1454 readers
40 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

with the way AI is getting by the week,it just might be a reality

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ThisIsAManWhoKnowsHowToGling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But Jane isn't technically an AI, she's more like a Boltzman Brain if anything. She technically doesn't even run on the computers she is connected to.

[โ€“] Prouvaire@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I've never given the distinction much thought, but as I recall (and it's been many years since I've read the Ender books) in Speaker for the Dead Jane was pretty much an AI, an evolved form of the fantasy game in Ender's Game. In later books Card may have more explicitly applied his Mormon-influenced concept of a soul that exists prior to, and after, inhabiting a physical form, to the character of Jane. But when I think of Jane, it's the Jane of Speaker for the Dead, as that's the book in the series (along with Ender's Game) that I read most often.