this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
79 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1454 readers
78 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm rewatching Final Destination.

And it dawned on me that all of the shots were choreographed for 3D animation.

I remember disliking 3D movies whenever we had those red and blue lens glasses.

And whenever the movie industry switched over to the new clear 3D glasses. I still didn't see the point in 3D movies. I watch them and then threw away the glasses at the end of the movie. The experience sucked, just like always.

So I'm curious.

Did anybody actually want 3D movies? Or was this something that the movie industry was just trying to shove down our throats?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TxTechnician@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it's pointless.

  • the effect wears off after the first or second scene. So then I'm just watching a regular movie where a handle occasionally comes out of the screen.
  • it's gimmicky. It just doesn't add anything of value for me.
  • it's a hassle. I don't want to wear (and eventually toss) a cheap pair of plastic glasses.

VR on the other hand. Rules.

[–] brettvitaz@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

That’s just like your opinion man