this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
74 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

40 readers
3 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • 1990: "wow, the ozone layer is getting destroyed. Who knows if we might have a planet. Might be better to not have kids"
  • 1970: "wow, life is more expensive than ever and the world might end in a nuclear war. Might be better to not have kids"
  • 1950: "wow, we just got out of the war and will need to rebuild the whole continent. Might be better to not have kids"
  • 1800: "wow, I spend 15 hours a day working in a factory and I can barely sustain myself. Might be better to not have kids".
  • 1400: "wow, I have back-breaking work in a farm and all of it goes to some king and I will never see. What is the point of this? Might be better to not have kids."
[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indeed, anyone can make up quotes about anything, without providing any substance to a discussion.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If you need it spelled out for you, I'll help: life was never easy, but it never stopped people from stepping up to it and taking the responsibility for it. That includes having kids. Being "afraid of having kids" because of some external issue seems like a bad excuse from people who just don't want to accept the responsibility.

[–] vmaziman@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Saying it’s our responsibility to have kids it’s implying it’s our responsibility to endlessly expand and multiply. That is the domain of viruses and creatures that exceed the environmental carrying capacity of their species

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it’s our responsibility to endlessly expand and multiply.

Not necessarily. We can still encourage people to have kids but keep it close to replacement rate (2.3 kids per woman)

[–] vmaziman@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But isn’t it the fact that we have so many people coming into the middle class with middle class resource usage that causes planetary resource overruse? Either we need less people in the middle class, or 7 billion ppl have got to go back to pre industrial levels of consumption

[–] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 1 year ago

Either we need less people in the middle class, or 7 billion ppl have got to go back to pre industrial levels of consumption

No, we need less people living with the north american standard of consumption. This is not the same as "middle class".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RIPandTERROR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a fucking stupid argument. How is it anyone's "responsibility" to have a kid? Please spell it out.

Here's my argument: it sounds hard and I don't wanna. Explain to me how I'm irresponsible. JFC 😂

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 year ago

What is your plan when you get to old age?

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are already way, way too many people on the planet.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And most of them are in Asia, old and about to die in 25 years or so.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The population on China and India is still growing. Have birth rates dropped below replacement levels?

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

population on China and India is still growing.

China is already declining.

Have birth rates dropped below replacement levels?

Yes, India is already below replacement levels and dropping further.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for the sources. Interesting to see that "The number of new births a year has nearly halved since 2016" in China.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 year ago

That's what demographic collapse looks like. Birth rate drops a cliff because the population finds itself suddenly without people in fertile age.

[–] Konlanx@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what you're saying is this all could have been avoided if people had less children in the 1400s?

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 1 year ago

"This all", good and bad, could/would happen anyway...